I first met Suzy the way I met so many OPB interview folks—via her books. In this case, it was Animals in Pants. I saw it at my library one day and picked it up because…well…it had a terrific trifecta (animals, pants, poetry!).
After some digging, I learned that Suzy’s the author of Animals in Pants (Abrams/Cameron Kids, illustrated by Kristen & Kevin Howdeshell) and Dinos that Drive (Tundra Books, illustrated by Dustin Harbin), with four more picture books arriving in 2027. Her poems have appeared everywhere from Highlights and Cricket to anthologies from Bloomsbury, DK, and Macmillan.
I’m also a fan of authors who have super-quotable things on their website, like this: “When I’m not reading or writing, I enjoy taking pictures, watching movies, and sliding around my apartment in socks, singing whatever ridiculous songs pop into my head. I live in New York with my sweet husband and our spicy cat.”
Intrigued, right? Let’s learn even more about Suzy right now.
RVC: So you grew up in Massachusetts making up weird stories on long car rides. What kinds of stories?
SL: There was something about the boredom of sitting in the car that would send me on these unhinged streams of consciousness. If I had a stuffed animal with me, he’d have a whole epic backstory. If I didn’t, I’d just anthropomorphize something else—a paper clip, whatever. For a while, I kept this little plastic green clown in one of our car’s empty ashtrays, and what a personality that guy had! Every car ride was an opportunity to workshop his stand-up routine. Then there were the fake ads, the jingles, the (embarrassing) raps. So many made-up songs! Sometimes I’d just stare out the window, singing random lyrics until my little sister screamed, “STOP, your voice SUCKS.”
I see now that I was almost writing. Almost. I wish I’d put some of it down on paper, but it never crossed my mind. Back then, “writing” meant doing a horrible book report for school, while this was just having fun, something to kill time between point A and point B. I didn’t realize it could count as something real.
RVC: Wow, what a way to start this interview. Thanks for that. Now, you were an actor before you were officially a writer. What stuck with you from that first career?
SL: My favorite parts of acting and writing have always been one and the same: diving into a character, finding their voice! The freedom of it! The sense of security, too. All the self-consciousness that comes with being myself falls away when I ask “What if?” and jump into someone else’s shoes. It makes me braver, counterintuitively more me.
RVC: You’ve said Shel Silverstein poems felt like “a thrilling gift” when you were a kid. Was there a specific one that flipped the switch?
SL: You know, I don’t think there was a specific poem that flipped a switch. I just remember being unreasonably psyched whenever a teacher would read a few of his poems in class. The conversational tone, the irreverence, the rhythm, the purposeful language that still managed to sound loose, the line drawings…there was a radical coolness to Shel Silverstein’s work that spoke to me then and still speaks to me now. Almost like a nudge to go ahead and be weird already.
RVC: Shel was awesome, no doubt about it. Back to you and your career. Before you were publishing your own picture books, you were placing poems in Highlights, Cricket, Ladybug—the whole magazine map. How much of your craft came from that grind?
SL: That grind was like grad school or something! Starting out, I looked at PB authors I knew and admired, like Diana Murray and Carrie Finison, with their long lists of magazine credits, and I saw a path forward. I saw achievable goals, so I wrote and submitted poems nonstop.
RVC: Love this.
SL: Of course, it wasn’t easy to sell to magazines. The competition was (and still is) fierce. I had to be strict, focusing on craft: clear imagery, natural-sounding phrasing, strong word choice, flawless meter, kid-friendly voice, sharp punch lines! If even a single word sounded off, the poem wasn’t ready yet. My critique partners put me through the wringer, and that’s why I started to see results. It’s how I got better at this!
RVC: Absolutely. Now I’ve been told that Animals in Pants started with a Brooklyn class prompt and a cat in pants. What was it about the pants that wouldn’t let you go?
SL: Strange mash-ups make for satisfying prompts. After I wrote that first cat-in-pants poem, I realized the possibilities were kind of endless. I jotted down a list of animals and a list of pants styles, then made some matches, taking the inherently nutty premise and applying good old-fashioned common sense—logistics! For example, what type of pants would best suit a monkey’s lifestyle? What problems might a manatee face while wearing denim? How would certain elephant traits influence their garment maintenance?
RVC: Ah, COME ON…I’ll be pondering these all evening now.…
SL: It was so fun that I mostly ignored my trepidations about no one in publishing ever buying poetry collections and kept going.
RVC: Cameron Kids acquired the book with a note that it needed more of an arc. What did retrofitting structure onto a finished collection teach you?
SL: First off, it taught me the power of intros and outros in this sort of narrowly focused collection, to get the ball rolling and give the work shape. Plus there’s a lot you can do just by being intentional with the order of your poems, creating the hint of an arc if not a traditional story arc—city-to-country, day-to-night, cold-to-hot, that sort of thing. Even the most subtle structure can give the book momentum, pushing the reader forward, letting them know they’re in good hands and not about to fall off some literary cliff.
RVC: You clearly applied those lessons early with Dinos that Drive. Was there a moment during drafting where you thought, “Oh, that’s what my editor meant last time”?
SL: Oh, right at the beginning! You can be sure I wrote my intro poem first this time! As opposed to tearing my hair out, writing five different potential intros, praying that one could be slotted in after the fact! Ugh!
RVC: It’s pretty clear that you’re passionate about meter. And I mean not merely counting syllables, but ACTUAL meter. What’s the misconception about meter that you correct most often?
SL: Ooh. Deep breaths. I could rant and rave on this topic for DAYS. I won’t, but I could…
RVC: I’m okay with whatever!
SL: I’d say the trickiest thing about meter is convincing smart, talented people who are only starting to write in rhyme that they can’t just “wing it” because they’re smart and talented. Meter isn’t easy; it isn’t counting syllables; and if you ask me, when it comes to rhyming verse, it isn’t optional.
RVC: I’m going to jump in here and say…YES! Please continue.
SL: I beg rhymers to avoid doing what I did, which was wasting at least a year thinking I could wing it, then wondering why no one was buying what I was selling. Even if you’ve got the world’s best ear, it takes a good class to learn how to do it properly, then tons of practice to learn how to do it well.
RVC: You’ve said humor is about surprise, but also that you’re not the class clown in real life. What lets you loosen up on the page?
SL: It probably goes back to that sense of security I mentioned earlier. When I’m writing, I don’t have to be myself. I can get a little wild and crazy. I don’t have to be overthink‑y, worrying about every choice for fear of making a mistake—sounding stupid, or rude, or inauthentic. What’s the worst that’ll happen if I make a mistake while writing? I’ll have to hit delete too many times? That’s a risk I can handle.
RVC: You already said it–rhyming collections are famously hard to sell. What finally cracked the door open for you, and what would you tell rhymers still stuck on submission?
SL: Yes, they’re ridiculously hard to sell, which is why I feel like a total goof whenever I write one. But hey, they sometimes sell! Look at my first two books! What finally cracked the door open for Animals in Pants, after years and years of nothing, was meeting my agent, Rachel Orr.
RVC: (FYI–the OPB interview with Rachel is right here)
SL: She just got it from the start, and was willing to take a chance that someone else would get it, too. And Amy Novesky was the editor who wound up being that someone. So in other words, two wonderful people and a bit of good luck!
RVC: And here’s the OPB interview with Amy! Yeah, the kidlit world’s smaller than many might think. Speaking of which–remind me, who’s your editor at Tundra for Dinos?
SL: That’s Margot Blankier–another wonderful person who’s helped make my poetry-collection dreams come true.
RVC: Sounds like it. Now, what would you say to fellow rhymers working on a collection?
SL: First off, you need a killer concept, something kids are going to love. I know a lot of us look at collections by, say, Shel Silverstein and think maybe ours can also cover a broad range of topics, but I’ve found that very few poets get away with that these days, unless they’re a big name and/or celebrity (eye roll). Narrower topics seem to sell more easily, probably because publishers know how they can market them. Of course your meter has to be tight, your rhymes fresh. Your poems should vary in sound while remaining pretty consistent in tone—meaning if you’re writing a funny rhyming collection, maybe don’t include that dark poem about death, even if it’s really good?
And while you’re waiting for those collections to sell, keep subbing one-off poems to magazines and anthologies! Agents and editors like to see a few of those credits. I think it makes them feel more confident that you know what you’re doing.
RVC: Speaking of things that can happen with poems beyond your own collections, “Iguano-Gone” became an actual country song. How did that happen, and can we hear it anywhere?
SL: For a long time I’ve been fascinated by the thin line between children’s poetry and song lyrics, probably because I secretly dream of being a lyricist although I’m not a musician. When I look at Shel Silverstein, or Sandra Boynton, or Cece Bell, all who’ve more than dipped a toe into the songwriting world, I feel empowered. So when I realized nothing was stopping me from writing a poem that’s a fake song in Dinos that Drive, I went for it!
And then “Iguano-Gone” became a real song, woohoo! Long story short, my sister and her partner, who are both in the music industry in Montréal, introduced me to a friend of theirs, an awesome country artist named Wood Andrews. He agreed to work with me, taking my poem and adding music and performance. He crushed it. We wound up with a really cute song! You can take a listen here.
RVC: You co-taught the Lyrical Language Lab with Renée LaTulippe. What’s the single most useful revision habit you’d hand a rhyming writer today?
SL: Yes, this fall I’m actually co-teaching the Lyrical Language Lab for the third time! What an honor. I took the class back in 2014, and it was a complete game-changer for me. I’m not exaggerating when I say everything I’ve achieved in my writing career happened as a direct result of that class. I’ve basically told Renée I owe her for LIFE.
RVC: Very cool.
SL: I think it’s important for rhymers to scan their work, actually writing out those little scansion marks, particularly when they’re just starting out; it helps to train your ear and make meter part of your muscle memory. And remember to put your manuscript down for a while, at least overnight, then read it aloud the next day. That little break always seems to expose stumbly bits that sounded smooth the night before! It’s very annoying, but helpful!
RVC: Since COVID, I like to ask people a health and wellness question. What’s your go-to for keeping yourself steady when a deadline stretch (or a launch, or a rejection) starts messing with you?
SL: I struggled for years—first as an actor, then as a writer. We’re talking far too many rejections for one lifetime, brutal on my self-esteem. I’d wonder if I was fooling myself, chasing pipe dreams. But there was one weirdly good thing that came out of that, which was learning to be resilient. Nothing gets me out of a rejection funk more than trying the next thing—well, that and complaining. Complaining to my writing friends feels healthy, because then they complain back, and suddenly it’s a full-on vent sesh and I’m kind of enjoying myself?
I will add that nowadays, it’s nearly impossible for me to take my wins for granted. I’m not skipping around like Pollyanna, but even when I’m venting to my crit group about this or that rejection, part of me is still thinking, “YES! I’m finally in a position where I get to complain about this stuff!” There’s an undeniable baseline joy that comes after years of ugh, now that things are (occasionally) working out.
RVC: Last question for this part of the interview. In all your experience in the kidlit writing and publishing world, what has most surprised you?
SL: I think I’m most surprised by how the work allows me to keep growing into myself, discovering new branches of who I can be, while also bringing me closer to who I was as a kid—you know, rapping about snack food in the car and stuff. Writing’s allowed me to reconsider the parts of myself that I always thought were too weird, and see them now as they really are—my greatest strengths. I’m surprised by how healing it’s all been.
RVC: Speed Round time, Suzy. Quick questions, fizzy-fast answers. Ready?
SL: Yeah. Bring it!
RVC: Best milkshake flavor?
SL: Coffee. I grew up within walking distance of a Brigham’s in Wellesley, MA, and man, that ice cream shop knew what to do. It was like sucking a solid pint of coffee ice cream through a straw. Oh, I’m supposed to be giving speedy answers, right? Hmm. Maybe the next one.
RVC: Guacamole, math, or small talk—which is marginally less awful?
SL: Ha! Surprisingly, small talk. I don’t love small talk, but I don’t love awkward silences more, so I’ve gotten fairly adept at chatting it up when required. I’ve met people at parties who probably took me for an extrovert, never suspecting I later went home and passed out from sheer social exhaustion. Okay, the next answer will be speedy, I swear.
RVC: Which Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? question got you?
SL: THANK YOU for bringing it up. I’ve been fuming over this stupid question for 17 years! Let’s air it out:
| The African Charrier coffee plant produces coffee with what unique property? ‘Ask the Expert’ lifeline used |
|
| ⬥ A: Caffeine-free | ⬥ B: Protein-rich |
| ⬥ C: Odorless | ⬥ D: Naturally sweetened |
So, Ryan, have YOU ever heard of African Charrier coffee? Because no one else I’ve talked to has, including my “Ask the Expert”! Not that I’m bitter or anything. At that point I quit and took the cash.
RVC: Which Dark Crystal character would you least want as a critique partner?
SL: Fizzgig! I’m guessing he’d be at least as unhelpful as his namesake (my cat, Fizzy), especially at mealtimes.
RVC: One piece of advice you’d give your pre-Animals in Pants self?
SL: If you’re doing something that makes you feel like you’re constantly banging your head against a wall, pivot! Pivoting is not a failure! The only failure would be sticking to something you hate just because you think you need to be good at everything. Take a leap and dare to find the thing you actually enjoy doing!
RVC: What makes a picture book worth returning to, again and again?
SL: Art and heart! No, I didn’t mean for that to rhyme, it just happened.
RVC: LOL. Thanks so much, Suzy!
SL: Wow, Ryan, these questions were awesome. You did your research. You’re like the Sean Evans of kidlit interviewers! Thanks so much!
Welcome to Rachel Orr, a longtime literary agent with Prospect Agency. Instead of going with the standard biography here, I’m going to include a few key things she’s said—or others have said about her—that are especially telling.
didn’t want it just magically flying behind her on every spread. So Laura came up with the idea to show Aunt Lucy looking in the mirror at the beginning of the book, and she thinks her hat is gone, but it’s really tied around her neck with ribbon and hanging behind her (which the reader can clearly see). It was such a fun solution, and taught me the importance of trusting an illustrator, too.
